Skill: write-like-james @ 30c51ca

MS Chemistry — build report, 26 September 2026

What you have

The whole course is built and closed on keys. Fourteen topics, three checkpoints and the end-of-course

form, every one of them written fresh, six-way reviewed, adjudicated, re-read blind, and every test bank

expanded to fifty or more items and cold-read twice. Zero answer keys ship unverified: across 1,847 blind

reads not one key disagreement survived (every "disagreement" the compare tool printed was a typed

surface form, and the tool now folds those).

Open course_preview/index.html for the rendered course. Every topic card names its state.

PieceLessonsPracticeBankBlind reads (lessons / bank)
T1 Solids, liquids, gases1012500 disagreements / 0
T2 Changes of state812500 / 0
T3 Properties you can measure512500 / 0
T4 Density512500 / 0
T5 Pure substances and mixtures512500 / 0
T6 Solutions912500 / 0
T7 Atoms and elements812500 / 0
T8 Inside the atom512500 / 0
T9 The periodic table714510 / 0
T10 Chemical formulas512510 / 0
T11 Physical and chemical change613510 / 0
T12 Reactions and conservation of mass812550 / 0
T13 Water's pulls412500 / 0
T14 Acids and bases612520 / 0
Checkpoint 1 (T1–6)——60 (48 MCQ + 12 written), Form A 300
Checkpoint 2 (T7–10)——60, Form A 300
Checkpoint 3 (T11–14) + Form E——60, Form A 30, Form E 400

91 lessons, each with an article, a video script ending "Okay, now your turn." and its gate question,

a quiz of 8–14 items, a topic intro and summary video; 706 figures drawn to one register per thing.

What the reviews kept finding, and what changed because of it

Every topic went through the same six readers before I touched it, and the same faults kept coming back.

Each one is now a rule in the vault, a step in the skill that would have caught it, and where possible a

mechanical sweep. The three that mattered most:

found four to thirteen "renamed templates" the author's own grep had missed. Fix: every item is designed

from a move line first and read against an inventory of every check; a course-wide register of every

named student (287 names) is built by script, not by hand.

figures answered their own question, a rule table sat beside the sort item it answers, blue litmus was

drawn so light it read as a cut-off strip. Fix: the hidden description gives drawn data only, the

headache figure is the teaching figure with the answer's layer off, and every render is measured by

script (thumbnail renderers hid text that a browser clipped).

bank items stated in a key the fact another item tests. Fix: term-recall items sit last (pending your

delivery ruling below); every bank carries a draw-one-per-test list the PP100 draw must respect.

Decisions waiting on you

Each was taken at the blueprint's recommendation or the coordinator's default so the build could finish.

None blocks a student sitting the course; each changes what a small pass would redo.

1. How the platform shows a quiz — one item at a time, or the page?

Call assumed: one at a time. Evidence: with a whole quiz on one screen, either the term-recall item

prints its answer below (old order) or the fluency stems print it above (new order); two Topic 12

give-aways and every topic's term-item position hang on this. What changes: nothing if one at a time;

if the page, term items move to a separate screen or become MCQs.

2. Before-and-after drawings: conserve atom counts everywhere, or keep nine particles a box?

Call assumed: nine a box in Topics 7 and 11 (atom KINDS always conserved), counts conserved from Topic 12

on, and no stem ever points at the count. Evidence: Topic 12 teaches conservation; a student who counts

Topic 11's boxes sees 4 become 9. What changes: redraw ~15 Topic 7/11 pairs if you want counts everywhere.

3. Phone-width tables. Call assumed: accept. Evidence: a 540-unit table renders its 13 px text at

about 8 px in a 324 px column, true of every table since Topic 3. What changes: one page-builder CSS rule

(horizontal scroll on narrow screens) if you want it.

4. Blueprint decisions for Topics 4–14 were all taken at their recommendation (recorded per topic in

topicNN_build/records/ADJUDICATION_*.md §6). Two worth a look: Topic 14 teaches bases on washing soda

solution (baking soda solution is borderline for litmus) and says "slaked lime" for the acid-lake line.

5. Number of forms. Call assumed: one Form A per checkpoint and one end-of-course Form E of 40. The

architecture leaves five forms as your call; the banks (60 each) support it.

6. Small register calls: steel "about 8 g/cm³" (Topic 4's value; 7.8 the alternative); the litmus

scope line in Topic 14 L04 (litmus changes only below ~4.5 or above ~8.3 — one bank item stands or falls

with it); Topic 6 says a more concentrated drink "tastes stronger" in three places, which seeds the

concentrated-equals-strong confusion Topic 14 later avoids; the register stamps TEKS 6.6/7.6/8.6, so the

end-of-course weighting uses those codes.

7. Two rule promotions in the vault: the headache-figure rule is ready to go from provisional to

standing (a second course now uses it); the S28–S34 sweeps are WARN-only and could be promoted to FAIL.

Where everything is

adjudication, bank passes), blind/ (every bundle, sequestered keys and reader files).

with its STAAR / SSA / AZSCI crosswalk in checkpoints/checkpoint3/records/CHECKPOINT3_BANK_2026-09-26.md.

with origin and scope, in the skill step that would have caught it, and in the tools where a check was

possible. Not pushed; your backup handles it.

What is not done

generation time. Photos are placeholder boxes with a "to be sourced" credit (Topic 9 bench, Topic 11 two

scenes, Topic 12 willow, Topic 14 L01).

11–13 use one feedback line for both verdicts; 137 item drawings from before the frame-floor ruling sit

under 320 units; nine Topic 2 bank items share a swapped option set. Each is a light pass when you want it.